One of James Bulgers killers returned to prison

[ozviking]

According to the papers, he's in there for child pornography so in 'reality' it was only a matter of time before he was going to do it again! ..........

.......He's been spotted in a jail and pinned someone against the wall and I quote from the paper 'lost it'. .......

That's quote a jump in the first sentence..

I can't believe the story from jail because I'd be very very surprised if he came into contact with anyone at all. He is going to be so well covered no-one will get near him... yet..

[Stanley Leisure]

Jack Straw's just busting to tell us all isn't he?

Keep an eye on the news from 3.30pm - pretty sure he's going to divulge what everyone's baying for.

[Mr Widnes]

Jack Straw's just busting to tell us all isn't he?

Keep an eye on the news from 3.30pm - pretty sure he's going to divulge what everyone's baying for.

It's on now:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/playlive/bbc_parliament/

[mike]

on sky news too...


http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Jack-Straw-Not-In-Interest-Of-Justice-To-Reveal-More-About-James-Bulgers-Killer/Article/201003215569592?f=vg

[Mr Widnes]

Cue the hysterical reaction tomorrow in the newspapers. 

[ozviking]

As if another example were needed that these ... whatevers .. should not be at large. Here's a comment from "Sandra" on Sky Blog

"There you go Martin, a clear example that innocent people have to suffer because one man has to be PROTECTED at all costs, where"s the justification for David Calvert in that.

I think you should be asking Jack Straw to spare a thought for David Calvert and those to come, which no doubt there will be, when he"s handing out his protect Venables at all costs speeches.

Makes me mad just to think about all this PROTECTION that one man is getting and innocent people are victimized because he"s been given the right by law of another name and anonymity.

Venables and the other one waived their human rights when they murdered Jamie, so dont anyone ask or expect me to support rules and regulations, fears of unfair trials, the first trial was unfair to both Jamie and his family and they were the VICTIMS.

Venables must think he"s a bloody V.I.P.

Sandra."
http://blogs.news.sky.com/lifeofcrime/Post:378d3257-3ea1-4744-b8fc-5ec63dca9413

[POPPY1]

Watching mrs fergus on 'this morning' programme and just want to say what a very brave and courageous person she is and I hope she gets the awnsers she deserves.

My thoughts are with her and a family.

It doesn't excuse venables and thompson, but if you ever get the chance ask her what she was doing when he was taken away, it may surprise a few people

[craigies6pack]

Why, do you know something Poppy? - momentarily distracted when shopping? Even back then I'm certain she would have thought he'd be handed in at the customer service desk.
If so it's hardly a crime.

It's precisely because of episodes like this and the Maddy McCann case that we are now so hyper sensitive about leaving the kids unattended for evan a second. Many moons ago 'in the good old days' kids, including me played relatively far away from home or our parents gaze with no problems.

There has to be an explanation or catalyst for why it has become so unsafe nowadays. Readily available porn/horror, less harsh prisons/sentences?

[rtid!]

It doesn't excuse venables and thompson, but if you ever get the chance ask her what she was doing when he was taken away, it may surprise a few people

Distracted by shopping, let go of his hand to pay for something was the story, which still does not justify what thye did to her little boy as punishment for it!!!

[POPPY1]

Why, do you know something Poppy? - momentarily distracted when shopping? Even back then I'm certain she would have thought he'd be handed in at the customer service desk.
If so it's hardly a crime.

It's precisely because of episodes like this and the Maddy McCann case that we are now so hyper sensitive about leaving the kids unattended for evan a second. Many moons ago 'in the good old days' kids, including me played relatively far away from home or our parents gaze with no problems.

There has to be an explanation or catalyst for why it has become so unsafe nowadays. Readily available porn/horror, less harsh prisons/sentences?

she wasn't shopping but was obtaining clothes

[craigies6pack]

Is that a fact .  I've never seen that reported.

Even if so it still doesn't excuse what went on.

[The Vicar]

she wasn't shopping but was obtaining clothes

Obtaining clothes , thats shopping isnt it . Or are you alluding that she may have been doing something illegal. Something that no other article  on this case in the last 17 years has made reference to.

As Craigie says if it were true it doesnt excuse what those two little spangles did , but is most likely just a viscious rumour spread by those with little else to do but besmirch the name and character of innocent victims of horrific crimes.

The Vicar

[POPPY1]

Obtaining clothes , thats shopping isnt it . Or are you alluding that she may have been doing something illegal. Something that no other article  on this case in the last 17 years has made reference to.

As Craigie says if it were true it doesnt excuse what those two little spangles did , but is most likely just a viscious rumour spread by those with little else to do but besmirch the name and character of innocent victims of horrific crimes.

The Vicar

It came directly from a copper working on the case at the time.

[Torn Sock]

It came directly from a copper working on the case at the time.

Still, dont think this has any relation to the fact that those 2 chocolate-bags got a joke sentence in a cushy kids jail with more perks than 90% of decent folk can afford and then are given protection for the rest of their lives.

let the bounties rot.

[The Vicar]

It came directly from a copper working on the case at the time.

Can you point me towards any articles or references were this Copper is attributed with the quote , or did this Copper say this to you alone .


The Vicar