Myler Estates
Trust in Widnes
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
24 May 2012, 20:52:48

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Want to see your advert here?
Contact Trust in Widnes for more details
386,157 Posts in 23,093 Topics by 1,209 Members
Latest Member: jenna
* Home Help Login Register
+  Trust in Widnes
|-+  The Messageboard
| |-+  Academy & Reserves (Moderator: deb)
| | |-+  Academy v Salford
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Academy v Salford  (Read 827 times)
John S
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,039


« on: 02 July 2011, 12:46:58 »

Half time
Salford City Reds 18
Widnes Vikings 24

Despite playing a much physically bigger team and going behind after 2 mins Widnes have played well despite missing players and the hot weather.
Salford may see their size count in the second half but so far-so good.
Logged

If winning isnt important---why keep score??
John S
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,039


« Reply #1 on: 02 July 2011, 13:39:57 »

Final score
Salford 48
Widnes 38

A purple patch which saw the home side score 12 points in as many minutes changed the game.
Logged

If winning isnt important---why keep score??
rugby11
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 51


« Reply #2 on: 03 July 2011, 10:31:00 »

what was the team ? anyone stand out
Logged
John S
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,039


« Reply #3 on: 03 July 2011, 10:55:00 »

what was the team ? anyone stand out

Owens, Butterworth, Hulme D, Fernyhough, Blackmore, Atkin, Price, Davies, Hulme L, Norton,McCann, Rigby, Buck  SUBS: Ball, Tague, Wainwright, Orme


Jack Buck had his best game, Chris Atkin was again influential and all the forwards worked hard.  I believe because Salford had no U20's game that some of those players who were eligible stepped down and that would account for the size difference.  However we could have won the game and when you think we were missing, Whity, Lawton, Gilmore, Brown and captain Hughes there was no shame in defeat.
Logged

If winning isnt important---why keep score??
rugby11
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 51


« Reply #4 on: 03 July 2011, 11:00:15 »

cheers sounds like it was a good game, lots of tries and in good weather too.
Logged
Ratboy
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,826


« Reply #5 on: 03 July 2011, 12:03:19 »

Owens, Butterworth, Hulme D, Fernyhough, Blackmore, Atkin, Price, Davies, Hulme L, Norton,McCann, Rigby, Buck  SUBS: Ball, Tague, Wainwright, Orme


Jack Buck had his best game, Chris Atkin was again influential and all the forwards worked hard.  I believe because Salford had no U20's game that some of those players who were eligible stepped down and that would account for the size difference.  However we could have won the game and when you think we were missing, Whity, Lawton, Gilmore, Brown and captain Hughes there was no shame in defeat.
When is Gilmore fit again?
Logged
John S
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,039


« Reply #6 on: 03 July 2011, 12:56:50 »

When is Gilmore fit again?

He has a date for the next op but until that has been done and he has fully recovered then there is no idea when he will be fit.
Logged

If winning isnt important---why keep score??
Ratboy
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,826


« Reply #7 on: 03 July 2011, 16:26:34 »

Hope all goes well mate.Thankyou anyway on update.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.07 seconds with 18 queries.