New trust joining banner
Trust in Widnes
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
25 May 2012, 06:22:46

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Want to see your advert here?
Contact Trust in Widnes for more details
386,199 Posts in 23,097 Topics by 1,209 Members
Latest Member: jenna
* Home Help Login Register
+  Trust in Widnes
|-+  The Messageboard
| |-+  General Rugby League
| | |-+  Salford's First Game at Barton
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print
Author Topic: Salford's First Game at Barton  (Read 2082 times)
rayvon
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,690


« Reply #30 on: 10 January 2012, 10:01:03 »

Sour and grapes. I couldn't give a spangles about that, we weren't right for SL that year.

We're in the league now and much deserved. I'll still be attending Salford, and really look forward to it for once! Use to hate going The Willows.

This
What else could Steve Simms say?
"Yes, I think Widnes deserve a franchise more than us, we play in a condemned virtually derelict stadium, our new stadium is still years away, so in an ideal world the RFL should just give up on us and promote Widnes and Celtic"
He is bound to praise his own club, you wouldnt expect anything else, and as someone else said, we should be praising them for actually achieving the goal of getting to a new stadium
Its Wakey and Cas who should be getting their acts together or getting booted out
Logged

I've already cancelled. Online banking my friend. Its the future.   What on earth makes you think that someone wouldn't cancel it? 
mick george
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,450



« Reply #31 on: 10 January 2012, 10:33:15 »

Sour and grapes. I couldn't give a spangles about that, we weren't right for SL that year.

We're in the league now and much deserved. I'll still be attending Salford, and really look forward to it for once! Use to hate going The Willows.

Spot on mate.
time to put the conspircy theories to bed and start supporting the game and not just one team
Logged

« Reply #17 on: 13 February 2012, 20:41:56 »
Can't see may more than 5k (hope i am wrong) at the Salford game but hey its ok we have 3 years to lose the rest


----------------------------------------------------------
ceejay
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,519


« Reply #32 on: 10 January 2012, 12:27:48 »

I hope their move to Barton goes womanly-curves up and they attract even lower crowds than at The Willows.Fook em.
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/rugby_league/s/1044561_salford_have_licence_to_thrill



A bit out of date this article was Dated April 2008
Logged
BarryJohn
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,978



« Reply #33 on: 10 January 2012, 13:56:43 »

This
What else could Steve Simms say?
"Yes, I think Widnes deserve a franchise more than us, we play in a condemned virtually derelict stadium, our new stadium is still years away, so in an ideal world the RFL should just give up on us and promote Widnes and Celtic"
He is bound to praise his own club, you wouldnt expect anything else, and as someone else said, we should be praising them for actually achieving the goal of getting to a new stadium
Its Wakey and Cas who should be getting their acts together or getting booted out

Brilliant post mate
Logged

Viva Ken Barlow
Viva Ken Barlow
Viiiiivaaa Ken Barlow,
he helps in the caff,
he's seen Blanch in the bath,
Viva Ken Barlow
Chris B
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,262



« Reply #34 on: 10 January 2012, 14:52:53 »

This
What else could Steve Simms say?
"Yes, I think Widnes deserve a franchise more than us, we play in a condemned virtually derelict stadium, our new stadium is still years away, so in an ideal world the RFL should just give up on us and promote Widnes and Celtic"
He is bound to praise his own club, you wouldnt expect anything else, and as someone else said, we should be praising them for actually achieving the goal of getting to a new stadium
Its Wakey and Cas who should be getting their acts together or getting booted out

Agree entirely with that mate, I think at the time though Dave Tarry came out with some disparaging comments about clubs with council owned stadiums and I think there were other comments (not sure who made these) warning the RFL about not being quick to believe clubs with recent financial issues making promises.
Wonder who they were talking about?  Kiss We love you too salford... In total I remember three or four articles in the MEN all with thinly veiled attacks on our bid whilst we did the job of focusing on our own.

Plus their whole application was based on, made up attendance figures, a rapidly unravelling promise to deliver an iconic 20,000 stadium and a pledge to attract more support from the massive Greater Manchester conurbation. Three years on and they have done absolutely stuff all.
 We now know that Red City Developments went under suspiciously close to the announcement,
 their crowds are still woeful,
 their hot young academy product upped and left (as he had done to us 2 years previously)
 they are now nothing more than tenants (and possibly soon to be junior tenants) in a council owned stadium
 they have achieved stuff all in the league

I also disagree heartily that we weren't ready three years ago. I'm not sure what has changed in the last three years that wasn't in place at the start of the 2009 season. I actually feel that we have been hamstrung in the last three years (about 500 regular attending fans have walked away in that time) and whilst I've enjoyed a lot of the rugby in the Championship I actually think we could be quite an established SL side now. For a kick off we wouldn't have faced quite the challenges in attracting top quality signings as we have done this year. Who knows what side we would have now having built year on year with SOC's backing.

I don't necessarily want them to fail... a big club in Manchester would be good for the game, but I understand why there is some bad sentiment towards them.
« Last Edit: 10 January 2012, 14:55:25 by Chris B » Logged

LeedsViking
Administrator
Millennium User
******

Rate This User: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 11,636



« Reply #35 on: 10 January 2012, 16:04:17 »

Attendance 2818

I was told by a Salford fan that attendance was limited at the game as part of the build up to obtaining the full Health & Safety certificate

Somehow I doubt it was limited quite that much though

Logged

Peter
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 9,824


« Reply #36 on: 10 January 2012, 17:00:39 »

Agree entirely with that mate, I think at the time though Dave Tarry came out with some disparaging comments about clubs with council owned stadiums and I think there were other comments (not sure who made these) warning the RFL about not being quick to believe clubs with recent financial issues making promises.
Wonder who they were talking about?  Kiss We love you too salford... In total I remember three or four articles in the MEN all with thinly veiled attacks on our bid whilst we did the job of focusing on our own.

Plus their whole application was based on, made up attendance figures, a rapidly unravelling promise to deliver an iconic 20,000 stadium and a pledge to attract more support from the massive Greater Manchester conurbation. Three years on and they have done absolutely stuff all.
 We now know that Red City Developments went under suspiciously close to the announcement,
 their crowds are still woeful,
 their hot young academy product upped and left (as he had done to us 2 years previously)
 they are now nothing more than tenants (and possibly soon to be junior tenants) in a council owned stadium
 they have achieved stuff all in the league

I also disagree heartily that we weren't ready three years ago. I'm not sure what has changed in the last three years that wasn't in place at the start of the 2009 season. I actually feel that we have been hamstrung in the last three years (about 500 regular attending fans have walked away in that time) and whilst I've enjoyed a lot of the rugby in the Championship I actually think we could be quite an established SL side now. For a kick off we wouldn't have faced quite the challenges in attracting top quality signings as we have done this year. Who knows what side we would have now having built year on year with SOC's backing.

I don't necessarily want them to fail... a big club in Manchester would be good for the game, but I understand why there is some bad sentiment towards them.

Except that Salford is in Salford.
Logged

Peter

Another jumped up Muppet
Chris B
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,262



« Reply #37 on: 10 January 2012, 17:39:58 »

Except that Salford is in Salford.

Well it is apart from around application time.
Logged

RB
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,125


« Reply #38 on: 20 January 2012, 00:00:05 »

Except that Salford is in Salford.

Except that Salford is in Barton.
Same borough no bus.
Logged
PMW
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 480



« Reply #39 on: 27 January 2012, 16:39:14 »

Hearing today that Salford have only sold 900 season tickets so far!!  Shocked  And only sold approx 70 tickets for the game at Saints! Poor, even by their standards.
Logged
efcviking
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,117



« Reply #40 on: 27 January 2012, 16:52:58 »

Hearing today that Salford have only sold 900 season tickets so far!!  Shocked  And only sold approx 70 tickets for the game at Saints! Poor, even by their standards.

That is extremely poor if true!
Logged

efcviking worst fan supporter ever seen

Can you play guitar? Can you galaxy!
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.104 seconds with 17 queries.