I am not saying that clubs should not be responsible for their own finances, and i am a fan of expansion, but should the RFL sit back and watch historic clubs go to the wall, whilst wanting to promote 4 expansion clubs. This in itself is not a problem, but the RFL are going to pay the operating costs, i.e: all travelling costs etc for the new clubs for the first 3 seasons.
I would love to see semi-pro clubs in towns like Northampton and it can only be a good thing for the game, but who are they going to play, if the historic clubs are allowed to go to the wall. I am certainly no marketing guru, but surely there must be ways to promote a great, all action, family friendly sport to the public
Good point. Expanding the game is good for the game, but surely expansion should mean a greater number of clubs rather than letting an historic club go and starting a new one elsewhere?