Some comments made by the Eddie contingency included Bill Arthur having asked the Wakefield lot what they thought of the pitch after warming up on it and I quote "they picked up grazes on their knees even in Warm up but other than that they are happy with it" and Phil Clarke stating it was "no safer than playing on grass & no more dangerous than playing on grass" Phil Clarke. On the whole they were happy with it, and I think that some of the more reasonable comments are indicating quite clearly that cuts and grazes sustained were no different from on grass, and we have seen evidence to support that grass has sustained worse in the bad weather. I would also like to say that if the RFL have endorsed the ipitch as we understand, somebody at Red Hall will have had to have done their homework on it!
See article, and I have included relevant points raised
http://www.runcornandwidnesworld.co.uk/vikings/vikingsnews/9190263.Widnes_Vikings_i_pitch_questions_answered/Was it a difficult task to seek approval from the RFL? Not at all, the RFL is working with the club
to ensure the pitch meets its required specification for rugby league. Further to this, the RFL has been undertaking extensive research and has employed specialists to ensure the pitch is fit for purpose. The RFL aims to publish its specification for artificial grass pitches on 16 September 2011. (has anyone seen that RFL publication?)
What are the risks to players from burns and or ankle twists?
There are no significant risks to players from burns and/or ankle twists.
Can you play on this pitch with studs?
Rubber studs and blades are the appropriate footwear for use on the i-pitch. This is the preferred modern-day footwear for the majority of professional athletes.