Ged Unsworth
Trust in Widnes
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
25 May 2012, 07:32:37

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Want to see your advert here?
Contact Trust in Widnes for more details
386,203 Posts in 23,098 Topics by 1,210 Members
Latest Member: evo88888888
* Home Help Login Register
+  Trust in Widnes
|-+  The Messageboard
| |-+  Widnes Vikings
| | |-+  Tim smith
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Tim smith  (Read 844 times)
steviking
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 156


« on: 04 February 2012, 01:04:25 »

Shown his class tonight although it wasn't a great game. Funny though that when we were linked with him he wasn't any good.
Logged
Neil
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,867


WWW
« Reply #1 on: 04 February 2012, 01:25:52 »

Tim Smith = best player on the pitch by a mile.... Has class.
Logged
viking warrior
Trust Member
Millennium User
****

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,452



« Reply #2 on: 04 February 2012, 01:30:12 »

eeeeeeeerrrrrrrmmmmmmmmmmmm no he wasn't, when jon clarke went off and never returned smith started to play well.one question for those who have watched them both would you have smith or watts?Huh my vote goes to watts
Logged

THATTO HEATH CRUSADERS...........THE BEST AMATEUR TEAM IN THE COUNTRY.
Rickp
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,309


« Reply #3 on: 04 February 2012, 01:40:51 »

eeeeeeeerrrrrrrmmmmmmmmmmmm no he wasn't, when jon clarke went off and never returned smith started to play well.one question for those who have watched them both would you have smith or watts?Huh my vote goes to watts
Maybe so. But how many games is Watts going to play & can he play when it really matters? We don't know yet. I for one hope so.
Logged
Neil
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,867


WWW
« Reply #4 on: 04 February 2012, 01:59:12 »

Smith.
Logged
Steve
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,371


« Reply #5 on: 04 February 2012, 02:26:30 »

Before the game I was talking about Smith and Lautiti as an attacking force against our under strength and out of position right side.
It annoys me more that if I could see this, why couldn't the team??!

Overall, I'm not as upset as some on here. Six 1st teamers out, key players too in terms of attack - then one try disallowed for us which looked 'benefit of doubt' to me as unclear, and one try given to them which looked a knock-on. Was the pass that released Marsh up the wing forward?  A few little decisions make a big difference.

First game. Work to do, but not a write off.
Logged

We came, we saw, they kicked our donkey!
13 positions, 2 Paddy's, plenty of tantrums!! Roll Eyes
mick george
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,450



« Reply #6 on: 04 February 2012, 02:29:26 »

Before the game I was talking about Smith and Lautiti as an attacking force against our under strength and out of position right side.
It annoys me more that if I could see this, why couldn't the team??!

Overall, I'm not as upset as some on here. Six 1st teamers out, key players too in terms of attack - then one try disallowed for us which looked 'benefit of doubt' to me as unclear, and one try given to them which looked a knock-on. Was the pass that released Marsh up the wing forward?  A few little decisions make a big difference.

First game. Work to do, but not a write off.

I had a decent view and it was forward
Logged

« Reply #17 on: 13 February 2012, 20:41:56 »
Can't see may more than 5k (hope i am wrong) at the Salford game but hey its ok we have 3 years to lose the rest


----------------------------------------------------------
Steve
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,371


« Reply #7 on: 04 February 2012, 02:41:15 »

I had a decent view and it was forward

Cheers! I didn't, hence the genuine question- will watch TV tomorrow!
Logged

We came, we saw, they kicked our donkey!
13 positions, 2 Paddy's, plenty of tantrums!! Roll Eyes
Mark
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 224


« Reply #8 on: 04 February 2012, 02:41:28 »

I never knew Wakefield had signed Quade Cooper.  Smith looks the spit of him, and he posseses the same level of skill he has.
Logged
Chris B
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,262



« Reply #9 on: 04 February 2012, 03:05:24 »

Watts will be better!!! Hanbury looked very good at times and I reckon will be very good.. No point in panicking just yet.
Logged

halton viking
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 486


« Reply #10 on: 04 February 2012, 03:07:46 »

I never knew Wakefield had signed Quade Cooper.  Smith looks the spit of him, and he posseses the same level of skill he has.
Haha what an absolute joke! Quads copper and Tim smith on the same level of skill!? Clearly not mate....
Logged
Mark
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 224


« Reply #11 on: 04 February 2012, 03:52:53 »

Haha what an absolute joke! Quads copper and Tim smith on the same level of skill!? Clearly not mate....

Well what I should have said he is like Cooper and possess some fancy skill.  But end of the day that was what we were sadly lacking tonight, hopefully Watts will be back next week, we need that spark in the attack. 
Logged
Mark
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 224


« Reply #12 on: 04 February 2012, 03:54:47 »

Plus its Quade, not Quads mate  Wink
Logged
johnf
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,813


« Reply #13 on: 04 February 2012, 04:12:09 »

Cooper is overrated and Smith is underrated. I'd rather have Tim Smith than Cooper.
Logged
Ratboy
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,828


« Reply #14 on: 04 February 2012, 06:14:18 »

Watts is better.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 18 queries.