steviking
Registered User
Rate This User: 0
Offline
Posts: 156
|
 |
« on: 04 February 2012, 01:04:25 » |
|
Shown his class tonight although it wasn't a great game. Funny though that when we were linked with him he wasn't any good.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Neil
Millennium User

Rate This User: 1
Offline
Posts: 1,867
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: 04 February 2012, 01:25:52 » |
|
Tim Smith = best player on the pitch by a mile.... Has class.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
viking warrior
Trust Member
Millennium User
  
Rate This User: 0
Offline
Posts: 1,452
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: 04 February 2012, 01:30:12 » |
|
eeeeeeeerrrrrrrmmmmmmmmmmmm no he wasn't, when jon clarke went off and never returned smith started to play well.one question for those who have watched them both would you have smith or watts?  my vote goes to watts
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
THATTO HEATH CRUSADERS...........THE BEST AMATEUR TEAM IN THE COUNTRY.
|
|
|
Rickp
Millennium User

Rate This User: 1
Offline
Posts: 2,309
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: 04 February 2012, 01:40:51 » |
|
eeeeeeeerrrrrrrmmmmmmmmmmmm no he wasn't, when jon clarke went off and never returned smith started to play well.one question for those who have watched them both would you have smith or watts?  my vote goes to watts Maybe so. But how many games is Watts going to play & can he play when it really matters? We don't know yet. I for one hope so.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Neil
Millennium User

Rate This User: 1
Offline
Posts: 1,867
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: 04 February 2012, 01:59:12 » |
|
Smith.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve
Millennium User

Rate This User: 2
Offline
Posts: 7,371
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: 04 February 2012, 02:26:30 » |
|
Before the game I was talking about Smith and Lautiti as an attacking force against our under strength and out of position right side. It annoys me more that if I could see this, why couldn't the team??!
Overall, I'm not as upset as some on here. Six 1st teamers out, key players too in terms of attack - then one try disallowed for us which looked 'benefit of doubt' to me as unclear, and one try given to them which looked a knock-on. Was the pass that released Marsh up the wing forward? A few little decisions make a big difference.
First game. Work to do, but not a write off.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We came, we saw, they kicked our donkey! 13 positions, 2 Paddy's, plenty of tantrums!! 
|
|
|
mick george
Millennium User

Rate This User: 0
Offline
Posts: 4,450
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: 04 February 2012, 02:29:26 » |
|
Before the game I was talking about Smith and Lautiti as an attacking force against our under strength and out of position right side. It annoys me more that if I could see this, why couldn't the team??!
Overall, I'm not as upset as some on here. Six 1st teamers out, key players too in terms of attack - then one try disallowed for us which looked 'benefit of doubt' to me as unclear, and one try given to them which looked a knock-on. Was the pass that released Marsh up the wing forward? A few little decisions make a big difference.
First game. Work to do, but not a write off.
I had a decent view and it was forward
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
« Reply #17 on: 13 February 2012, 20:41:56 » Can't see may more than 5k (hope i am wrong) at the Salford game but hey its ok we have 3 years to lose the rest
----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Steve
Millennium User

Rate This User: 2
Offline
Posts: 7,371
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: 04 February 2012, 02:41:15 » |
|
I had a decent view and it was forward
Cheers! I didn't, hence the genuine question- will watch TV tomorrow!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We came, we saw, they kicked our donkey! 13 positions, 2 Paddy's, plenty of tantrums!! 
|
|
|
Mark
Registered User
Rate This User: 0
Offline
Posts: 224
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: 04 February 2012, 02:41:28 » |
|
I never knew Wakefield had signed Quade Cooper. Smith looks the spit of him, and he posseses the same level of skill he has.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris B
Millennium User

Rate This User: 2
Offline
Posts: 2,262
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: 04 February 2012, 03:05:24 » |
|
Watts will be better!!! Hanbury looked very good at times and I reckon will be very good.. No point in panicking just yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
halton viking
Registered User
Rate This User: 0
Offline
Posts: 486
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: 04 February 2012, 03:07:46 » |
|
I never knew Wakefield had signed Quade Cooper. Smith looks the spit of him, and he posseses the same level of skill he has.
Haha what an absolute joke! Quads copper and Tim smith on the same level of skill!? Clearly not mate....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark
Registered User
Rate This User: 0
Offline
Posts: 224
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: 04 February 2012, 03:52:53 » |
|
Haha what an absolute joke! Quads copper and Tim smith on the same level of skill!? Clearly not mate....
Well what I should have said he is like Cooper and possess some fancy skill. But end of the day that was what we were sadly lacking tonight, hopefully Watts will be back next week, we need that spark in the attack.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark
Registered User
Rate This User: 0
Offline
Posts: 224
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: 04 February 2012, 03:54:47 » |
|
Plus its Quade, not Quads mate 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
johnf
Millennium User

Rate This User: 2
Offline
Posts: 5,813
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: 04 February 2012, 04:12:09 » |
|
Cooper is overrated and Smith is underrated. I'd rather have Tim Smith than Cooper.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ratboy
Millennium User

Rate This User: 1
Offline
Posts: 5,828
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: 04 February 2012, 06:14:18 » |
|
Watts is better.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|