Ged Unsworth
Trust in Widnes
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
25 May 2012, 07:40:14

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Bridlewood Riding Centre
Ty'n-y-Morfa, Nr.Prestatyn, North Wales
www.bridlewood.co.uk  or  Tel: 01745 888922
386,203 Posts in 23,098 Topics by 1,210 Members
Latest Member: evo88888888
* Home Help Login Register
+  Trust in Widnes
|-+  The Messageboard
| |-+  Widnes Vikings
| | |-+  Widnes best team for 59 mins
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Widnes best team for 59 mins  (Read 931 times)
Kelvin
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 73



« on: 04 February 2012, 01:33:14 »

14-10 after 59 mins,
....sadly it is an 80 minute ball game

14-10 after two missed cons, then daft penalty for a ball steal from white on 59 mins, mathers scores from the next play!!!

Cross sin binned!!! heads drop!!! tiredness and then let wakey run away with it!!!!

All you doubters remember we had watts, kite,phelps, briscoe missing!!!



Long season but lots of positives¬!!! wakey will upset a few of the top teams this year!!!

roll on hudds!!!!
Logged

You can't change the past.
Neil
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,867


WWW
« Reply #1 on: 04 February 2012, 01:35:18 »

No positives at all mate - was our 2nd easiest game of the year and we shipped far too many points.. We are poorly coached and again recruited poorly...

N
Logged
Dawn
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,139



« Reply #2 on: 04 February 2012, 01:36:11 »

yes, we do hae those guys out / not here yet.....Phelps had tweeted a very supportive message earlier this evening 0 sunds like he is really looking forward to getting stuck in!!  Smiley
Logged

Steve O'Connor "we are not going to Super League to make up the numbers, we are going to dominate"...31/3/11.    

You cannot build a reputation on what you are going to do

Time to restore some pride WV!!

Clone Paddy
Rickp
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,309


« Reply #3 on: 04 February 2012, 01:36:57 »

No positives at all mate - was our 2nd easiest game of the year and we shipped far too many points.. We are poorly coached and again recruited poorly...

N

Don't go there Neil you'll upset people. Wink
Logged
GSF
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,458


« Reply #4 on: 04 February 2012, 01:46:26 »

We hung in there for 59 mins,somehow.Then their superiorty showed.
Logged
Torn Sock
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,283



« Reply #5 on: 04 February 2012, 01:51:40 »

Don't go there Neil you'll upset people. Wink
So leading for an hour is not a positive???
Some players putting in a good performance isn't a positive?
Enthusiasm and line speed early on wasn't a positive?
Players missing but still competing isn't a postive?

You guys must be the life and sould of any party you go to??? Undecided Huh
Logged

vidi, vici, veni.

sorry your honour, i just got a bit confused
Rickp
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,309


« Reply #6 on: 04 February 2012, 01:55:00 »

So leading for an hour is not a positive???
Some players putting in a good performance isn't a positive?
Enthusiasm and line speed early on wasn't a positive?
Players missing but still competing isn't a postive?

You guys must be the life and sould of any party you go to??? Undecided Huh
I'll go GSFs' post above. Sums the night up accurately for me.
Logged
Neil
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,867


WWW
« Reply #7 on: 04 February 2012, 01:58:36 »

We had 18 ish tackles on there line and the most creativity we showed was a stutter and a scrappy offload ! We had no set patterns... No one knew what the person inside them was gonna do..It was very dis-jointed.. Betts' scarf was a disgrace as well...
Logged
Booster
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 18


« Reply #8 on: 04 February 2012, 10:12:33 »

So leading for an hour is not a positive???
Some players putting in a good performance isn't a positive?
Enthusiasm and line speed early on wasn't a positive?
Players missing but still competing isn't a postive?

You guys must be the life and sould of any party you go to??? Undecided Huh

Come on why so positive 18 new players and more trauma than us re getting in sl and they looked a gelled and aggressive unit we looked poor and aimless
Logged
wildej
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,753


« Reply #9 on: 04 February 2012, 10:28:17 »

No positives at all mate - was our 2nd easiest game of the year and we shipped far too many points.. We are poorly coached and again recruited poorly...

N


Get real.   If you can do better, get down there and show everybody instead of spouting rubbish on here.   It is a 27 gmae season and we will improve as the season goes on.   Nobody expected us to lead the table from the off and I do not expect us to be even in the top half until season 2 and 3.
Logged
mick george
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,450



« Reply #10 on: 04 February 2012, 10:51:35 »

Get real.   If you can do better, get down there and show everybody instead of spouting rubbish on here.   It is a 27 gmae season and we will improve as the season goes on.   Nobody expected us to lead the table from the off and I do not expect us to be even in the top half until season 2 and 3.
a kinda shoot yourself in the foot post  Wink
Logged

« Reply #17 on: 13 February 2012, 20:41:56 »
Can't see may more than 5k (hope i am wrong) at the Salford game but hey its ok we have 3 years to lose the rest


----------------------------------------------------------
HelmetHead
Registered User
*

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 367


« Reply #11 on: 04 February 2012, 10:56:41 »

No positives at all mate - was our 2nd easiest game of the year and we shipped far too many points.. We are poorly coached and again recruited poorly...

N


Who's the easiest game? Get a reality check pal. Lots of positives and the scoreline flattered them! They probably just edged the game until the binning. Go watch it again. Did Betts give penalties away? We looked very enterprising early on but after they made it 6-4 we went into our shells.

Knowing Widnes we will beat Huddersfield next week and then lose to Salford.
Logged

Reg Reagan Is The Living God
Dawn
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,139



« Reply #12 on: 04 February 2012, 10:57:03 »

just finishing watching the match back and agree with the 59 minute mark.

From there our defence was wide and Mathers, Fox and Smiths tries were all via holes in the defensive line - this should be easily rectified during training, and things will only improve - and of course we had Ben Cross missing for 10 of those minutes which wouldn't have helped defensive lines/  Onwards and upwards is the way!  Grin

Wiiiiidnesssss!!!  Grin
« Last Edit: 04 February 2012, 11:10:42 by Dawn » Logged

Steve O'Connor "we are not going to Super League to make up the numbers, we are going to dominate"...31/3/11.    

You cannot build a reputation on what you are going to do

Time to restore some pride WV!!

Clone Paddy
johnf
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 2
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,813


« Reply #13 on: 04 February 2012, 11:00:49 »

a kinda shoot yourself in the foot post  Wink

Right Mick - out comes that shilling - season 3 - I say we will finish in the top half - you on ?

No positives at all mate - was our 2nd easiest game of the year and we shipped far too many points.. We are poorly coached and again recruited poorly...

N

Seriously - does life always work out according to your ordering of things ? You must make millions at the bookies - can you tell me the top 8 in order for this season please ? I've got a shilling that I'm happy to bet with ....
Logged
neilw
Millennium User
**

Rate This User: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,052



« Reply #14 on: 04 February 2012, 11:07:19 »

Come on why so positive 18 new players and more trauma than us re getting in sl and they looked a gelled and aggressive unit we looked poor and aimless

Sums it up for me I'm afraid. They were is a pretty similar situation to us in regards to the number of new players and new coach but they looked like they had trained and played together. Had set plays and looked more interested in winning this game for me. Surely we can have set moves that the whole squad knows and not rely on have player X, Y OR Z on the pitch to put it into practice?

Disappointed it was a game we could of won but we didn't show enough to do that. They did and they get a bit of confidence from that we have to look again at our game options and cut out the ill discipline.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.3 seconds with 18 queries.