Lloyd white

[Booster]

Not sure what you all thought here but what a completely ineefective and dis interested player. Nine or seven - no chance.

We have watts or nothing

I was also very disappointed with Moore who ran up his own backside ll night

[Ratboy]

Not sure what you all thought here but what a completely ineefective and dis interested player. Nine or seven - no chance.

We have watts or nothing

I was also very disappointed with Moore who ran up his own backside ll night

Seen two friendlies and was cola last night.Craven ahead of him and may say Coyle.

[HelmetHead]

Not sure what you all thought here but what a completely ineefective and dis interested player. Nine or seven - no chance.

We have watts or nothing

I was also very disappointed with Moore who ran up his own backside ll night

How do you know he was disinterested - did he tell you that?

[25tap]

have seen some cola on this board over the years but this is up there with the best . bet dave allen and tommy coyle are made up youve found a new whipping boy and it only took you 50 minutes.

[Booster]

This is exactly why this board is so often wrong. He was poor and in the absence of watts and Clarke had an opportunity to set the play something badly needed and e did not get anywhere near.

Come on let's remember none of us get praise at work for putting our shoes on the right feet so why shoud they.

[MT]

Just because he was ineffective (and I agree he didn't make much of an impact) doesn't mean he was disinterested. Players will have poor games, but I don't believe we should write them off on the back of only one competitive fixture.

[Booster]

I agree but my concern is half back who does not want to get involved. We looked poor organisationally and without watts toothless. Who ran the show.

Moore has to control better from the ruck as he got caught far too many times making two or three yards.

[MT]

White played mostly at hooker at Crusaders. I reckon that Craven is our next best option for a halfback behind Watts and Hanbury but we couldn't play him there due to the absence of Briscoe and Flynn leaving us short of options at fullback.

[Ratboy]

White played mostly at hooker at Crusaders. I reckon that Craven is our next best option for a halfback behind Watts and Hanbury but we couldn't play him there due to the absence of Briscoe and Flynn leaving us short of options at fullback.

Agree mate and once Phelps here he can play fullback if Briscoe injured.Jack Owens needs dual registration or u20s action to develop more.Craven for me is a Standoff.

[MT]

I think Owens is an outstanding prospect but it will be a couple of seasons before we see him playing regularly in the first team.

[Steve]

Being available to play is always a bonus though.

Gutted for Flynn and Watts, last night could have been their big stage!

[richardviking]

White should have been in the halves with Hanbury last night. Clarke was ineffective.

[own brain]

White should have been in the halves with Hanbury last night. Clarke was ineffective.

yeah he did nothing second half

[rayvon]

yeah he did nothing second half

 

[J20]

This is exactly why this board is so often wrong. He was poor and in the absence of watts and Clarke had an opportunity to set the play something badly needed and e did not get anywhere near.

Come on let's remember none of us get praise at work for putting our shoes on the right feet so why shoud they.

This is true, though coming into the game at 6 is never easy half way through and I guess he was set to come on at 9 where he did a good job at Saints. I think starting him at 6 with Hanbury at 7 would have been the best idea but as I say I guess the idea was to use him at 9.